🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a recent legal decision.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on Tuesday that it would reexamine the case concerning the executive power with an expanded group of 11 judges. The court also vacated a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had sided with the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the latest development in a long-running legal battle over whether the former president has the legal right and justification to deploy state military units in the city. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in uncertainty since the end of September when the deployment effort was initiated in due to months of protests.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has argued that federal officials at the ICE facility in south Portland were facing threats, while city and state officials maintain that local officers have command of the situation.

In defiance of characterizations of Portland as a conflict zone, locals have been posting videos of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and organizing activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in Portland enacted two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federalization of the state troops, and another stopping the use of any military personnel in the state, after efforts to evade the initial injunction by calling up troops from California.

On the previous day, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, blocking the actual deployment of the forces.

En Banc Review

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard by the full court – with all decisions under consideration together – by a group of eleven justices.

“This decision shows that the truth matters and that the courts are working to ensure government responsibility. The constitution restricts the executive authority, and local populations cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” stated the legal representative in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot send the armed forces into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, principles, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding moves forward and our legal battle continues in the judicial system.”